Black Coral Inc clarifies what is really going on!
Inaction on sustainability accelerates climate change, while resource exploitation and resulting instability in impoverished nations drive climate and social migration. The aim of economic wars against the Global South is not to ensure a fair exchange of resources but to keep the majority of the world in a state of struggle, subservience, and compliance with the wealthiest minority. It is a conflict against peace, perpetuating justifications for war.
The crux of the matter is that contented people do not wage war. We possess the technology to provide the world with free energy, water resources, affordable transportation, and fuel at no cost, as well as a plentiful supply of food and inexpensive access to education through a global exchange of information. Yet, governments persist in devising ways to foster anger and hostility, aiming to keep the populace dissatisfied and under their sway through fear and ignorance. The primary objective is to prevent the majority of the world from learning about existing technologies that could empower them and render the relentless pursuit of vast wealth unnecessary and ineffectual.
The focus is now on African countries because if they adopt sustainability as a standard practice, the world could see numerous real-life Wakandas emerging, rather than just one fictional one in movies. Ghana, along with 10 other nations in Sub-Saharan Africa, is constructing solar power plants, while many other countries are also investing in sustainable infrastructure such as agroforestry, Atmospheric Water Generation, and protecting seed sources to ensure food security without external interference.
The “attack” on global food supplies by wealthy nations can be understood through several interconnected factors that highlight the inequalities in the global food system. These factors include economic policies, trade practices, and geopolitical dynamics that disproportionately favor wealthier countries at the expense of poorer nations.
1. Economic Policies Favoring So-Called "Wealthy" Nations (In reality these nations cannot exist without foreign resources you can't eat oil or drink printed paper dollars)
"Wealthy" nations often implement agricultural subsidies that allow their farmers to produce food at artificially low prices. This practice creates an uneven playing field in the global market, making it difficult for smallholder farmers from developing countries to compete. As a result, these policies not only undermine local agriculture in poorer nations but also perpetuate poverty and hinder regional biodiversity.
2. Trade Practices and Export Restrictions
The interconnectedness of the global food system means that trade practices significantly impact food security worldwide. Wealthy nations prioritize securing their own food supplies over addressing the needs of exporting countries. For instance, during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic or geopolitical conflicts like the war in Ukraine, many wealthy countries have imposed export restrictions on essential commodities to protect domestic markets. This behavior exacerbates food insecurity in developing nations that rely heavily on imports.
3. Geopolitical Dynamics and Resource Exploitation
Wealthy countries frequently exploit resources from less affluent nations, shaping policies to their benefit under the pretense of enhancing food security. This often takes the form of land acquisitions for agriculture or dominance over supply chains, sidelining smallholder farmers who play a crucial role in global food production but are deprived of essential resources and infrastructure. This unsustainable system is further strained by the smaller youth populations in these wealthy nations, which undermines their ability to engage in prolonged conflicts and preserve demographic sovereignty. The risk is that, should war occur, the migrant populations within these nations could swiftly become predominant.
4. Climate Change Impact
Climate change serves as a threat multiplier, initially impacting the economies of "wealthy" nations and then disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations in developing countries, despite the fact that wealthier nations have historically been the larger contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. The repercussions of climate change, including extreme weather events and rising sea levels, pose significant threats to agricultural productivity in low-income countries, thereby worsening the existing disparities within the global food system. One major impact of global warming and increased extreme weather is the reduction of birth rates in regions where the population lacks genetic defenses against the detrimental effects of extreme heat on fertility.
5. Lack of Global Cooperation
Despite being aware of these disparities, there is currently a lack of global cooperation aimed at ensuring multilateral food security. Countries are often unwilling to sacrifice their interests for collective benefit, leading to a fragmented approach where immediate national concerns overshadow long-term solutions for global food stability. This of course increases climate migration and causes political upheaval as borders are crossed by climate refugees!
To summarize, the assault on global food supplies by affluent nations is driven by economic policies that prioritize short-term profits from industrial agriculture, trade practices that favor domestic interests over global collaboration, geopolitical strategies that exploit resources from less wealthy nations, and insufficient responses to the effects of climate change. These factors collectively exacerbate the risks faced by disadvantaged groups within the global food system.
Comments